-
Aaron Burr Cock
- 4 stars Rating: 70
4001 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5424)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GamecockWorld
- 4 stars Rating: 67
2514 votes total - Gamecock
- (2393)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
johnhunt said...
Joe, don't take this the wrong way but you sound almost cavalier in your view towards bigger and more expensive government.
He did not simply increase spending by a couple million - it's increased by several trillions! Part of the problem with deficit spending is the average Joe (no offense) has no clue of the amount of money being flittered away….it’s inconceivable.
There was a time when a million dollars was considered an exorbitant amount - reference the scene from Austin Powers when Dr Evil attempts to extort a ransom of one million dollars from the world body so he will not use his “laser” to destroy parts of the planet….he gets laughed at….so he ups the ante to 100 billion – still a paltry sum by today’s deficit standard.
The affordable healthcare bill – all well and good when touted in liberal and progressive sound bites and talking points – have you or anyone you know actually read all 2700 plus pages of the bill? Do you or any of your student peers know precisely what’s contained in the bill? You cite a couple of sources extolling the virtues of the plan – are these sources more sound, more cogent than those being presented by the opposition before the courts?
“Mandates are not liked but they will lower the deficit, provide insurance to 30 million people, drive down medical costs, and require everyone to buy something that I'm sure you already buy anyway” – I believe you compared it to being required to purchase auto insurance. People who don’t own cars are not required to purchase auto insurance.
It’s a bad thing because it was rushed through the democratic controlled congress probably out of fear that they will not be in control after the bill gets passed. Which turned out to be the case.
It’s a bad thing because it does not apply to everyone equally – check your sources and see how many companies, many with union ties, are exempt from the mandates.
It’s a bad thing because the majority of the people are against the bill as a whole. Had the wise men of fantasyland picked one or two items at a time to put forward I believe there would be far more acceptance and a lot less partisan divisiveness.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5877 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8651)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GamecockWorld said...
I talked personally to Steve so thank you. Yes I believe every public place should be handicap accessible that is not taking away anybodys civil liberties. Do you believe women should be allowed to vote do you believe they're still should be slavery? All men were created equally and endowed by our creator. It's called equality.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5877 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8651)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CayceCock
- 5 stars Rating: 90
813 votes total - Tre Bray
- Rooster
- (710)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CayceCock said...
No offense to anyone on this board, honestly, but DADT is all politics and way over blown. I am a proud member of the US Army it has changed nothing, not one bit. (through my observations) DADT was all political not about the Soldiers (Gay or Straight) at all.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5877 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8651)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GamecockWorld said...
I talked personally to Steve so thank you. Yes I believe every public place should be handicap accessible that is not taking away anybodys civil liberties. Do you believe women should be allowed to vote do you believe they're still should be slavery? All men were created equally and endowed by our creator. It's called equality.
Aaron Burr Cock
- 4 stars Rating: 70
4001 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5424)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GamecockWorld
- 4 stars Rating: 67
2514 votes total - Gamecock
- (2393)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Surfside Cock
- 4 stars Rating: 63
1773 votes total - Gamecock
- (1735)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GamecockWorld said...
DADT is moral issue and not a civil liberties issue if a gay man or lesbian in the military is not allowed to say if they are gay or not does not physically infringe on there lives.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5877 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8651)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CayceCock
- 5 stars Rating: 90
813 votes total - Tre Bray
- Rooster
- (710)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Aaron Burr Cock
- 4 stars Rating: 70
4001 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5424)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GamecockWorld
- 4 stars Rating: 67
2514 votes total - Gamecock
- (2393)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
joetheogre said...
This is a backwards attitude. Black people being disenfrachised in the 50s did not directly affect their lives, yet it was still their right to vote.
You went on a big rant about how everyone is created equally and is endowed be their creator. Does this somehow not apply to homosexuals because you personally take issue with it?
GamecockWorld
- 4 stars Rating: 67
2514 votes total - Gamecock
- (2393)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GamecockWorld said...
You know I have gay and lesbian friends and everyone of them tell me that the ACLU have really hurt their causes with the way they go about it. Also the San francisco crowds have hurt their causes to.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5877 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8651)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Surfside Cock
- 4 stars Rating: 63
1773 votes total - Gamecock
- (1735)
- 30 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GamecockWorld
- 4 stars Rating: 67
2514 votes total - Gamecock
- (2393)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GamecockWorld said...
They were already serving openly ask any man or woman in the military if the new which person was gay they would know. The banner of DADT was way outed so the ending of DADT did nothing.
This post was edited by joetheogre on 4/4/2012 at 3:54 PM
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5877 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8651)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
81 Alumnus
- 4 stars Rating: 77
2834 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (2609)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
joetheogre said...
So isn't it better to end this discrimination on paper? How would you feel in handicapped people technically weren't allowed to vote, but everyone kind of ignored it and let them do so anyway. Wouldn't you feel coming out and settling the issue would be best?
johnhunt ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
2092 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (4664)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
maxcy124sc90
- 5 stars Rating: 89
526 votes total - Rooster
- (984)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
joetheogre said...
The individual mandate was actually an idea of republicans to maintain the free market in health care. The thing with the health care bill is that you already pay for others to get it - in the form of higher costs. If everyone had the same access, people would get check ups instead of waiting until they need emergency surgery. So instead of paying half a million dollars for someone on welfare to have a costly surgery and rounds of intense chemotherapy, you can pay less for him to have periodic check ups and less intense treatment when a problem is detected. That is an extreme example, but whether you realize it or not you are essentially already paying for a universal health care system, except the one we have now costs more.
maxcy124sc90
- 5 stars Rating: 89
526 votes total - Rooster
- (984)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
maxcy124sc90 said...
Please don't take this the wrong way but I've read all of your posts and the problem is that you don't really understand the question. Obamacare is unconstitutional. The federal gov. has enumerated powers in the Constitution which are very specific. It really is irrelevant who already pays what to whom, etc...Let's be clear...if the federal government can mandate that individuals must purchase products as declared by whoever is in charge, office, etc...at the time....THEN WE HAVE NO RIGHTS...GAME OVER. We will not survive as a society...as a free men and women...over time...we will not be free. DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THIS? The Constitution was written to LIMIT the powers of the government in insure INDIVIDUAL freedom...not individual healthcare, success, or enjoyment. When you give away your freedoms you must not think of the present...think 100, 200, 300 years ahead...WE MUST ALL DECIDE, SOON, WHAT IS OUR FREEDOM WORTH?
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5877 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8651)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
johnhunt said...
You're talking apples and oranges with your liberal , ain’t it wonderful, johnny come lately view of gays in the military and equating that with disenfranchisement of blacks. Your giving credit to the O-man with that change in policy is misplaced…it is more a reflection of “changes “ in societal acceptance and not on presidential leadership.
Sexual orientation is not a civil right or a civil liberty - there is no right to be openly gay - there is no right to be a man who wears women’s clothes - people will argue but there are choices with how someone dresses and who excites them in the shower. What you do in your home/bedroom is your business and not an issue for public scrutiny
Straw man situations comparing handicapped people being prohibited from voting to sexual proclivity discrimination is ludicrous and nonsensical.
Thirty years ago I was stationed at the Presidio in San Francisco - Don't ask, don't tell was not the prevailing policy then yet Gay soldiers "knew" to get themselves posted there.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5877 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8651)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
maxcy124sc90 said...
................................... Obamacare is unconstitutional. The federal gov. has enumerated powers in the Constitution which are very specific. It really is irrelevant who already pays what to whom, etc...Let's be clear...if the federal government can mandate that individuals must purchase products as declared by whoever is in charge, office, etc...at the time....THEN WE HAVE NO RIGHTS...GAME OVER. We will not survive as a society...as a free men and women...over time...we will not be free.................................... DO YOU NOT
81 Alumnus
- 4 stars Rating: 77
2834 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (2609)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5




Halftime