In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 2910
On this Board 157Record: 514 (5/20/2013)
Online now 3135Record: 9625 (10/8/2011)
The place for Gamecock talk, news and information
The place for Gamecock football and recruiting talk, plus off-topic subjects.
The place for Gamecock basketball talk, news and information
The ultimate online destination for the latest scoop on Carolina's national power baseball program.
Everything from Gamecock Insider Tony Morrell, in case you missed it.
The place to read all past editions of Spurnotes
The best of the best
Buy and sell your Gamecock tickets here.
Feedback for TBS and 247Sports.
You have no favorite boards.
Nor did it elicit the same level of outrage as the others ... Navajo Nation spokeswoman Erny Zah said in an interview on Monday: ''We have gone through the atrocities to survive and ensure our way of life continues,''
"Any mockery, whether it's Halloween, Victoria's Secret — they are spitting on us. They are spitting on our culture, and it's upsetting,"
I would only ask, is intent relevant in either offending or feeling offended or is it a moot point.
This post was edited by johnhunt on 11/14/2012 at 8:59 AM
I agree that they are not the same.
I do not think intent is relevant in offending but it may be to a greater extent in being offended. It is certainly possible to offend without intending to do so and I know I have been offended by others who have no ill-will.
However, intent is incredibly important, imo, in determining the proper course of action going forward. Lack of malicious intent should make any outrage (whether real or manufactured) short-lived or nonexistent.
You may run like Hayes, but you hit like $*!#
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports