-
SCarcock
- 3 stars Rating: 56
26438 votes total - Preston Buchanan
- Bronze Spur
- (6101)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
a7xrox
- 5 stars Rating: 81
871 votes total - Rooster
- (521)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
SCarcock
- 3 stars Rating: 56
26438 votes total - Preston Buchanan
- Bronze Spur
- (6101)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
El Guapo
- 5 stars Rating: 81
3394 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (4627)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
El Guapo said...
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2009/11/30/global-warming-e-mails-scandal-show-scientists-may-have-cooked-the-facts
Preliminary analysis of the contents of thousands of E-mails and documents taken from the computer archives of the Climate Research Unit at England's University of East Anglia—possibly by a hacker, possibly by a whistleblower—indicate a number of the world's most important scientists engaged in research designed to prove that global warming really does exist may have been cooking the books.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
6201 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (9304)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
6201 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (9304)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Black Death7
- 5 stars Rating: 85
3255 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (3971)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
TheRoosterCrows
- 5 stars Rating: 86
2637 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (3214)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
dgriffin
- 4 stars Rating: 76
380 votes total - Bantam
- (486)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
MrNiceGuy
- 3 stars Rating: 55
4039 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (3209)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
CockyMike1
- 4 stars Rating: 80
4184 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (3196)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
augustacarguy
- 5 stars Rating: 87
433 votes total - Rooster
- (806)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
johnhunt
- 5 stars Rating: 91
2168 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (4788)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
6201 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (9304)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
augustacarguy
- 5 stars Rating: 87
433 votes total - Rooster
- (806)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
EarthyTechnoPop
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1114 votes total - Gamecock
- (1094)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Tempest
- 4 stars Rating: 80
2336 votes total - Gamecock
- (1986)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
Tempest said...
I guess we need to differentiate here. We're discussing man-made global warming, correct? I can concede that we most certainly have an effect on the environment. Can pro global warmers admit that the earth has cyclical temperatures?
The question becomes - which has more of an effect on the environment? To say its caused by man today is a bit of a stretch for me.
Examples - smog warning days in LA in the late 80's/early 90's were nearly ever single day. Today they very rarely have them. It's like that everywhere across the country. Vehicles and smoke stacks, two big culprits of pollution, aren't nearly as harmful as they were 20 years ago.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
6201 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (9304)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
augustacarguy said...
I don't believe in global warming, but not because I'm a car guy. Also, even if 100% of scientists agree, it doesn't make them right.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
6201 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (9304)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
augustacarguy
- 5 stars Rating: 87
433 votes total - Rooster
- (806)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
augustacarguy said...
I just don't think anyone knows climate data much further back than maybe two hundred years or so, certainly not a couple of thousand years. Not to say it isn't hot. I sat through the Braves game yesterday. First pitch, they said it was 110 on the field.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
6201 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (9304)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
augustacarguy said...
I just don't think anyone knows climate data much further back than maybe two hundred years or so, certainly not a couple of thousand years. Not to say it isn't hot. I sat through the Braves game yesterday. First pitch, they said it was 110 on the field.
EarthyTechnoPop
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1114 votes total - Gamecock
- (1094)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
augustacarguy
- 5 stars Rating: 87
433 votes total - Rooster
- (806)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
EarthyTechnoPop
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1114 votes total - Gamecock
- (1094)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
augustacarguy
- 5 stars Rating: 87
433 votes total - Rooster
- (806)
- 17 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ... | 8









So does anybody think this might be global warming?