Online Now 1826

Palmetto Proving Grounds

The place for Gamecock talk, news and information

On this Board 1029
Record: 4035 (11/24/2012)

Online now 1513
Record: 9625 (10/8/2011)

Boards ▾

Palmetto Proving Grounds

The place for Gamecock talk, news and information

The Barnyard

The place for Gamecock football and recruiting talk, plus off-topic subjects.

The McGuire Room

The place for Gamecock basketball talk, news and information

The Sarge

The ultimate online destination for the latest scoop on Carolina's national power baseball program.

GCI Archives

Everything from Gamecock Insider Tony Morrell, in case you missed it.

Spurnotes Archives

The place to read all past editions of Spurnotes

Video Archive

Hall of Fame

The best of the best

Ticket Exchange

Buy and sell your Gamecock tickets here.

Test Forum

Feedback for TBS and 247Sports.

Reply

Another freeloader suing the Gamecock Club

  • Pierce211 said...

    It isn't infinity , can be passed once

    so potentially 100 years maybe more, at 1984 levels

    signature image

    CockStar

  • CockStar said...

    so potentially 100 years maybe more, at 1984 levels

    Maybe if you have Strom Thurmond genes

    Pierce211

  • to be clear MrBigAl, I respect your position, but we just see it in two different lights, and that is ok.

    signature image

    CockStar

  • I believe the issue under dispute with this suit and the one settled earlier is over the Lifetime Members now being charged for parking. The contract (showed on tv last night) simply says that the member was guaranteed an assigned parking spot. The University contends that this is not a promise of a "free" spot. They have decided to charge those members for parking just like the rest of us. The Plaintiffs contend that because it has been free since the mid-80's that free was an "implied benefit".

    skcusnosmelc

  • MrBigAl said...

    How would Grandaddy like it if the federal government cut off his social security benefits because circumstances have changed since the 1930's?

    This just proves, once again, you have no idea what you're talking about.

    To give this discussion some better focus, here's the part of the contract that outlines what original donor gets...

    If you look at this, he gets "four season tickets (best available)"...what does that mean? Who decides what "best available" means? He gets "assigned reserved parking". OK, but that may not always mean the spot they have now/have had...it doesn't specify the spot, but that they will get "assigned reserved parking" somewhere. Then it says "the tickets may be assigned to one designated heir". It doesn't say the entire package, including the parking spot, is assigned, just the tickets. You could even make the argument, given the placement of this, that it only applies to the football tickets.

    I think it's obvious to anyone (especially an attorney like Al) that this contract could be viewed/interpreted in different ways, as written. It is, frankly, poorly written. I can see how there could be dispute, but I also think Bubba is trying to hold on like grim death to "prestige" he did not pay for. If there is a legitimate dispute, there is a courthouse in every county for that purpose. Going on TV to try and call attention to yourself and shame the University you claim to support, well, that's not to my liking.

    This post was edited by CockOfAges on 6/21/2012 at 9:36 AM

    attachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    CockOfAges

  • gimme my parkin beeyotch

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by CockStar on 6/21/2012 at 9:16 AM

    attachment
    signature image

    CockStar

  • MrBigAl said...

    I'd like to be proud of my school partially because the word of those who run the place means something.

    Al,
    Does the contract say that the lifetime donor and his designated heirs will never be charged for parking?
    My reading of the situation is that the contract promises only a guaranteed assigned space without any mention of fees.

    Kelso Red

  • MrBigAl said...

    The contract allows for the original purchaser to designate an heir. Is the University free to enforce some parts of the contract and ignore others?

    I'm not familiar with the specifics of the lifetime membership but if it gave the rights to give it to the heirs I agree with you Al. It's what we were taught as kids and try to teach ours. Keep your word. Now I think it was the right decision to do away with these going forward. Do the heirs have to give anything more to the Gamecock Club to keep it going or does the original investment cover it? Under the lifetime membership I mean. Just don't know.

    Gamecock Jay

  • CockStar said...

    Yeah let's just let the other sec schools get farther ahead on facilities and the product on the field be horrible, but hey Mawmaw and Pawpaw got their seats, assuming they actually show up and (gasp!) stand and cheer.

    Negotiate buyouts of the contracts and if Mawmaw and Pawpaw dont want the buyouts they can pound sand for not wanting what's best for the school.

    Piggy-backing on a dirt cheap lifetime membership and then suing over it? THAT is shameful.

    I love the University and am all for the YES program even though it costs me a helluva lot more than it used to for the same seats.

    That said, if a contract was written and agreement reached (which includes beneficiary rights), I can't blame folks for being upset if the university didn't live up to the contract. You can't promise something in writing to get someone to pay x amount and then decide later to violate the tenents of that contract. There are certainly ways to honor these contracts and still raise money.

    Many of these lifetime members agreed to give extra money when approached by USC. Still, others should not feel obligated. Some of these lifetime members joined at a very young age. They bit the bullet at a time in their lives where they had to give up other things. They did so because of what was included in the offer. They sacrified a portion of their income that was a much larger percentage than what many pay now at higher giving levels. Some took out loans to cover the cost. I understand why they would feel wronged.

    That said, if it all comes down to parking, they can KMA. Tickets and priority points, yes. Parking? Nope.

    ospop4690

  • MrBigAl said...

    Steve, the contract allowed the father to designate a successor to his rights under the contract. If the membership died along with the father there wouldn't be a dispute.

    I disagree that Hyman had to breach these contracts. There are very few lifetime members. He could have found a way to honor the written contracts or otherwise satisfy them.

    I'm reading thru all these posts. Agree Al. Stupid idea in the first place but honor our word. I'm sure there will be a settlement. I like almost all of Hyman's decisions but this wasn't one of them.

    Gamecock Jay

  • MrBigAl said...

    You're missing the point. The original purchaser of the membership had the right to transfer the membership.

    No, you are, and you keep trying to make your "point" without reference to the actual contract. Only the tickets transferred, and arguably just the football tickets, per the express terms of the contract. Why are Hyman/the University in the wrong for seeking to enforce the contract, especially if they're asking the transferee simply to pay for parking?

    attachment
    signature image signature image signature image

    CockOfAges

  • WKJ_JR said...

    Funny that you saw fit to write both of these sentences in the same post.

    i do know the particulars of what the university is doing overall with these lifetime memberships

    just not any of the particulars to the family in question here [e.g. any negotiations they've had with the university, stage of the lawsuit, etc]

    its unfortunate that so many people around here are willing to turn a blind eye when our school screws over its supporters

    please no crying when it happens to you then, okay?

    Bom274

  • CockStar said...

    gimme my parkin beeyotch

    whats with the assumption that these people are lazy litigious freeloaders?

    calling them lazy is just ugly and supported by nothing whatsoever

    and re litigious, sure they are suing the university, but the fact that its reached that point

    where people who presumably love the university and gamecock football feel so f-d over that they have to initiate a lawsuit against their own school? doesn't seem like something any gamecock fan would want to do unless stuff was really messed up ....

    Bom274

  • Bom274 said...

    whats with the assumption that these people are lazy litigious freeloaders?

    calling them lazy is just ugly and supported by nothing whatsoever

    and re litigious, sure they are suing the university, but the fact that its reached that point

    where people who presumably love the university and gamecock football feel so f-d over that they have to initiate a lawsuit against their own school? doesn't seem like something any gamecock fan would want to do unless stuff was really messed up ....

    Seeing Bubba's rotund arse on TV whining about not being able to see and be seen by the Cockabooses for free anymore doesn't strike me as particularly dignified. He kept saying "we" paid for this and that...no, Bubba, your daddy did in 1986. It's 2012...might be time for you to pay for a space on your own.

    signature image signature image signature image

    CockOfAges

  • CockOfAges said...

    Seeing Bubba's rotund arse on TV whining about not being able to see and be seen by the Cockabooses for free anymore doesn't strike me as particularly dignified. He kept saying "we" paid for this and that...no, Bubba, your daddy did in 1986. It's 2012...might be time for you to pay for a space on your own.

    i actually do think your point is reasonable

    i'd be interested to hear what a court says about interpreting the contract

    i guess what has turned me off is how the university has handled this stuff over the past few years

    ---

    on a somewhat related note [ie ticket price increasings, seat taxes, etc]; its also frustrating to see so many empty seats when our team and program is better than ever

    I'm going to be very disappointed if there are as many empty seats at the games this year as compared to last

    as much money as they spend on advertising..................

    Bom274

  • steve miller said...

    This. USC made a deal with his father, correct?

    And his father is now passed away? So USC kept their end of the bargain with whom the agreement was made.

    You have to see how wrong this is right? USC made a contract with his father and heir. If "HEIR" was in the contract, then it was part of the deal that the father considered. (probably a large part, considering it basically doubles the contract).

    I am not for suing my own team, but you can't just act as if the words of the contract mean nothing.

    Stouds1

  • CockOfAges said...

    Seeing Bubba's rotund arse on TV whining about not being able to see and be seen by the Cockabooses for free anymore doesn't strike me as particularly dignified. He kept saying "we" paid for this and that...no, Bubba, your daddy did in 1986. It's 2012...might be time for you to pay for a space on your own.

    lol

    signature image

    CockStar

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    Two grand boys, Two state championships. 3-peat USC

    Big Train

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    simms2000

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    Kelso Red

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image

    CockStar

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    simms2000

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image

    CockStar

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial

    GarnetOP

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! 7-Day Free Trial
    signature image signature image signature image

    CockOfAges