In partnership with CBSSports.com
Online Now 983
Online now 996 Record: 9625 (10/8/2011)
The place for Gamecock talk, news and information
The place for Gamecock football and recruiting talk, plus off-topic subjects.
The place for Gamecock basketball talk, news and information
The ultimate online destination for the latest scoop on Carolina's national power baseball program.
Everything from Gamecock Insider Tony Morrell, in case you missed it.
The place to read all past editions of Spurnotes
The best of the best
Buy and sell your Gamecock tickets here.
Feedback for TBS and 247Sports.
You have no favorite boards.
The most viewed topics.
The most replied to topics.
The most up-voted topics.
The most down-voted topics.
The most up-voted posters.
The most down-voted posters.
The most followed posters.
Just because a Clemson fan said it, doesn't mean it's wrong. Just like with politics. Just because a republican says it, doesn't make it wrong
Some of your points are relative. One mistake you made was saying that our DL depth this year is not what it was last year. We have more depth this year. Sutton, Clowney, Taylor, and Fordham on the edge, and we are 5 deep at tackle, and lose very little. Obviously, when Clowney comes out there is a dropoff, but everyone else is pretty much interchangable.
clempsun's offense has looked very good, as has taj. It has been in the ACC, though. Everything is relative.
Ally will beat the crap out of Uga.
Yeah, but the fact that it's wrong makes it wrong. There isn't any comparison between our DL and Auburn's. Hell, we have 2 backup DEs in the conference's sack leader list.
I think the point was that Clemson can counter different coverages with different patterns. Our d line is very good, particularly when Clowney is 100%, which is not certain.
Florida State - - - I know it played in the ACC ---- has a defense loaded with athletes. Clemson still put up a bunch of points against FSU. I think that Clemson will score on us. Its too versatile, but we can still win the game if our offense plays very well.
The Clemson guy is getting torched for making some good points. And, I would take Nuke or Sammy over any of our receivers, and Boyd, this year, over Shaw.
BUMP at line. PressureTajhand no one gets toasted.......
Why are you saying "our, us and we"?
This isn't Tigernet!
then take them....take em to pickens with you....nobody will miss you
and to whomever said tackle/take the 15 yards when beat on a double move...you dont get your hands on a WR in that situation--the angles all wrong
So, who will get more tired during the game: Clowney, or Vajh who will be running for his life and the OT that has to try to keep up with Clowney?
Yeah, our DL depth is not good with Chaz Sutton (future starter), very experienced Aldrick Fordham who can play DE or DT, Dixon, Dukes, and talented Surrat. Plus, look at our LB depth especially when they all can move and rush the passer.
"U better start fryin' them eggs a lil b it better than you been fryin 'em!"
So how did all that route-running science work out after all?
Will Ellington count?
Ceece... "Clemson WILL get 200 yards through the air"
I love it when people make assertions of fact that are just their hollow opinions... Didn't get 200 thru the air... your offense was dominated for the last 45 minutes of the game....
The only double move Nuke had last PM was a curl and shit your pants looking out for DJ LOL!
Glad this thread was bumped.
LOL at this fool, he hasn't posted once since the clemp game. If you read this jack lord, hope you enjoy another year of ownage.
Looki dis foo.
LOL at taking any of those guys over ours. Bruce and Ace were the best WR in the stadium that night. I'm not even going to comment on how much better our backup QB was than tasha.
FWIW, it's not nuke it's nuk, short for nukkie. You know the thing with the nipple on it that babies suck on. This info comes directly from his mama. I read it somewhere.
247Sports In partnership with CBS Sports