Online Now 1827

Palmetto Proving Grounds

The place for Gamecock talk, news and information

On this Board 775
Record: 4035 (11/24/2012)

Online now 1762
Record: 9625 (10/8/2011)

Boards ▾

Palmetto Proving Grounds

The place for Gamecock talk, news and information

The Barnyard

The place for Gamecock football and recruiting talk, plus off-topic subjects.

The McGuire Room

The place for Gamecock basketball talk, news and information

The Sarge

The ultimate online destination for the latest scoop on Carolina's national power baseball program.

GCI Archives

Everything from Gamecock Insider Tony Morrell, in case you missed it.

Spurnotes Archives

The place to read all past editions of Spurnotes

Video Archive

Hall of Fame

The best of the best

Ticket Exchange

Buy and sell your Gamecock tickets here.

Test Forum

Feedback for TBS and 247Sports.

Reply

DT recruiting

  • In my opinion, we have 2 DT's committed in this class already. Gerald Turner is around 260, and David Johnson is 255. Now, I am sure they were not told this, as telling someone that the goal is to move them to the most unheralded position in football is not a good recruiting strategy, but this is probably in their plan. After Melvin, you could see how Lawing and Ward probably like the idea of recruiting big athletic LB types and letting them grow into DL's.

    I would bet they mess around at LB/pass rushers for a year or two, and by their Jr years, they have their hands in the ground. Alfy Hill fits this role perfectly also, but DT will not be a big need by the time he graduates. I think this is a good strategy. We all know Lawing is the one who can pull this off.

    Anyways, I truly believe this is the plan. I also believe those two may be resistant to it. It will be interesting to watch, but I can assure you, we will not be left with nobody at any particular position. That does not happen to smaller programs, much less USC.

    This post was edited by steve miller on 8/3/2012 at 9:27 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    Ally will beat the crap out of Uga.

    steve miller

  • Turner already knows that's the plan for him.

    eddy

  • I'd rather we signed DTs to begin with. As for not being left with nobody at DT I would hope that the bar's set somewhat higher than that these days.

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl

  • I think it's easier to sell these big framed guys on becoming DTs much more so than OLs. A lot of them already know they are destined for DT when they sign, anyway. Not really a matter of growing some of them into DTs...rather a matter of they are going to out-grow DE/LB, anyway, & they know it and the coaches know it & did from the get-go. Yet, because they played DE (or LB) in H.S. & are listed that way by recruiting/scouting services, many fans think that they are simply DE "washouts" & we need tackles so we try to grow them into that role. A 255-260 Lb. youngster with the right frame who is dedicated in the weight room & follows the right diet can easily be 285-290 or more by the time he's a RS soph which is about when an SEC DT should begin to figure in the rotation. I know this goes back quite a ways, but Roy Hart , the NG that anchored that '87 defense (& allowed Joe Lee Dunn to do so many diff. things), arrived at Carolina at 6'0" 240 Lbs. Even then, elite DTs/NGs were already at least 280 Lbs. When I saw his height & weight on the signee list, I thought, "Boy...this dude's kinda short for a DE...guess this is why Georgia didn't take him & we had to 'settle' for him"!!. Roy turned out to be an outstanding interior DL & had a nice career in the NFL!!

    "I wouldn't trade the dirt under his (Roche's) fingernails for anyone else's soul"~ Coach Frank McGuire

    cocksteady

  • I agree Steve. I love those big mlbs that grow into DTs. Sorta like what Iowa does with TEs and growing them into OTs.

    Twitter @rcspur

    RCSpur

  • I'd rather have them at DE.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." -Charles Darwin

    joetheogre

  • We will never win the SEC with growing people into DT's. The top end of this confrence will run it down our throat. There is a differance between a guy who is still getting used to carrying 300 lbs and someone that has lived with that size for several years.

    signature image

    cocky4now

  • cocky4now said...

    We will never win the SEC with growing people into DT's. The top end of this confrence will run it down our throat. There is a differance between a guy who is still getting used to carrying 300 lbs and someone that has lived with that size for several years.

    Exactly. Guys like Melvin are very, very rare.

    I want my DTs to eat up space and free up the DEs and OLBs.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." -Charles Darwin

    joetheogre

  • Warren Sapp was an LB.

    tippecanoe

  • cocky4now said...

    We will never win the SEC with growing people into DT's. The top end of this confrence will run it down our throat. There is a differance between a guy who is still getting used to carrying 300 lbs and someone that has lived with that size for several years.

    Its a way schools get speed and athleticism on the field. To think we are the only ones doing it is wrong. HS CBs move to S, Safety to Olb, Olbs to MLBs, MLBs to DE and DEs to DT. Its been going on as long as college football has. It happens everywhere in every class. Granted we still need to recruit big HS DTs but two of the best SEC DL, Ingram and LSUs Brockers, were HS LBs.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by El Guapo on 8/2/2012 at 5:43 AM

    "People always ask me if I wish I were bigger. I tell them no. I always wanted to be a miniature badass." Dustin Pedroia

    El Guapo

  • cocky4now said...

    We will never win the SEC with growing people into DT's. The top end of this confrence will run it down our throat. There is a differance between a guy who is still getting used to carrying 300 lbs and someone that has lived with that size for several years.

    These are 17 and 18 year old kids that could very possibly grow an inch or 2 easily in the next year or so. It's not the same as some 35 year old guy gaining 40 lbs.

    signature image

    LedCock

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    Sabu1

  • cocky4now said...

    We will never win the SEC with growing people into DT's. The top end of this confrence will run it down our throat. There is a differance between a guy who is still getting used to carrying 300 lbs and someone that has lived with that size for several years.

    It can always happen. It happened with Melvin Ingram but it's not very commom. Back in the 1990's that was our DT recruiting strategy because we couldn't sign top tier DT's.

    signature image signature image signature image

    GamecockTripp

  • GamecockTripp said...

    It can always happen. It happened with Melvin Ingram but it's not very commom. Back in the 1990's that was our DT recruiting strategy because we couldn't sign top tier DT's.

    Melvin Ingram was a DE.

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl

  • tippecanoe said...

    Warren Sapp was an LB.

    I think he was TE coming out of HS, but you can put Sapp in the same category as Melvin, joetheorge said correctly in his post:

    "Guys like Melvin are very, very rare."

    signature image

    Brooster

  • Brooster said...

    I think he was TE coming out of HS, but you can put Sapp in the same category as Melvin, joetheorge said correctly in his post:

    "Guys like Melvin are very, very rare."

    Yes, he was a TE in HS and ,unlike Melvin, was actually a DT in college.

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl

  • GamecockTripp said...

    It can always happen. It happened with Melvin Ingram but it's not very commom. Back in the 1990's that was our DT recruiting strategy because we couldn't sign top tier DT's.

    It can happen but its a poor recruiting strategy , you can sign tall receivers and grow them to TEs, it just not a good idea in this conference. Its a tough enough league without having to learn a new position when enter your sophomore season. (I guess that's about the time you will know if the individual can grow into the position)

    This post was edited by Brooster on 8/2/2012 at 7:11 AM

    signature image

    Brooster

  • DT's since 2004. Not counting 2012 since they have not hit the field.

    Recruited at DT: Marque Hall, Matt Raysor, Lemuel Jeanpierre, Jarriel King, Kenrick Ellis, Joel Reaves, Olufemi Ajiboye, Donte'e Nicholls, Jonathan Williams, Kenny Davis, Byron Jerideau, Kelcy Quarles, J.T. Surratt,

    4 SEC DT's: Hall, Ellis(if he had stayed around), Ajiboye, Kelcy Quarles
    Jerideau needs to play more, too early on Dixon, Dukes and Green

    Recruited as LB or DE: Nathan Pepper, Melvin Ingram, Travian Robertson, Aldrick Fordham
    3 SEC DT's: Peppers, Ingram and Robertson
    Fordham has played a lot but not what I would call and SEC DT.

    I think it takes both for us to have a decent defensive line. True high school DT's that can become legit SEC DT's are just a very rare animal. Though we recruited 13 DT's (not counting Dixon, Dukes and Green) there are only 4 that I would say were legit SEC DT's.

    Out of the 4 that were converted from DE or LB we have 3 legit SEC DT's. I quess really 2 since Melvin was never a true DT. But all 4 have contributed at DT.

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Garnet101 on 8/2/2012 at 7:14 AM

    Garnet101

  • MrBigAl said...

    Melvin Ingram was a DE.

    Same difference. He was a LB that grew into a DE/DT. You missed the point.

    signature image signature image signature image

    GamecockTripp

  • Melvin was a QB & RB.....

    This post was edited by ThunderCock on 8/2/2012 at 8:38 AM

    signature image signature image signature image

    ThunderCock

  • Garnet101 said...

    DT's since 2004. Not counting 2012 since they have not hit the field.

    Recruited at DT: Marque Hall, Matt Raysor, Lemuel Jeanpierre, Jarriel King, Kenrick Ellis, Joel Reaves, Olufemi Ajiboye, Donte'e Nicholls, Jonathan Williams, Kenny Davis, Byron Jerideau, Kelcy Quarles, J.T. Surratt,

    4 SEC DT's: Hall, Ellis(if he had stayed around), Ajiboye, Kelcy Quarles Jerideau needs to play more, too early on Dixon, Dukes and Green

    Recruited as LB or DE: Nathan Pepper, Melvin Ingram, Travian Robertson, Aldrick Fordham 3 SEC DT's: Peppers, Ingram and Robertson Fordham has played a lot but not what I would call and SEC DT.

    I think it takes both for us to have a decent defensive line. True high school DT's that can become legit SEC DT's are just a very rare animal. Though we recruited 13 DT's (not counting Dixon, Dukes and Green) there are only 4 that I would say were legit SEC DT's.

    Out of the 4 that were converted from DE or LB we have 3 legit SEC DT's. I quess really 2 since Melvin was never a true DT. But all 4 have contributed at DT.

    Melvin Ingram was a DE.

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl

  • GamecockTripp said...

    Same difference. He was a LB that grew into a DE/DT. You missed the point.

    I didn't miss the point he was in no way a DT. He was a DE. If Clowney moves inside a few plays a game are you going to call him a DT?

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl

  • Not necessarily true. USC has not won a title yet but Melvin and Travian were not DT's in HS. In most occasions 17 or 18 year old kids have not fully developed. Often the early developed kids in hs plateau in college while others take off. Melvin, Travian, and Delvin are prime examples. The DT a few years ago from Alabama was a Juco. As a hs student he was a 3 star.

    shoeless

  • cocky4now said...

    We will never win the SEC with growing people into DT's. The top end of this confrence will run it down our throat. There is a differance between a guy who is still getting used to carrying 300 lbs and someone that has lived with that size for several years.

    Melvin Ingram and Travian Robertson disagree

    This post has been edited 3 times, most recently by roosterrizk1 on 8/2/2012 at 9:28 AM

    signature image

    roosterrizk1

  • roosterrizk1 said...

    Melvin Ingram and Travian Robertson disagree

    Can't imagine why you'd try to claim that MI was a DT, unless it's to rationalize our less-than-stellar DT recruiting.

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl