-
97srad750
- 5 stars Rating: 82
2047 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (3236)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Fripp Island
- 5 stars Rating: 90
490 votes total - Rooster
- (649)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
rmctacdmc
- 4 stars Rating: 71
7021 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5826)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
cockfool
- 5 stars Rating: 91
6936 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (4270)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
97srad750
- 5 stars Rating: 82
2047 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (3236)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
cockballfan ●
- 5 stars Rating: 88
77 votes total - Bantam
- (148)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
rmctacdmc
- 4 stars Rating: 71
7021 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5826)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
97srad750 said...
If you make a change you get Marshall. Some may say he's an ahole, but as far as I know he isn't a known liar and cheat. He is allowed to coach, he does seem to have an affection for the university so it isn't a stop gap, and just like Pearl he has won at every stop.
rmctacdmc
- 4 stars Rating: 71
7021 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5826)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
rmctacdmc said...
Really? Who do you think we are? Pearl is a proven high level winner, and you want to turn your nose up at him, in favor of another mid major coach? Sorry, I'll take the chance and go with the proven SEC winner.
This post was edited by jaydeejazzyjeff on 2/22/2012 at 10:59 AM
jaydeejazzyjeff
- 5 stars Rating: 95
579 votes total - Rooster
- (744)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jaydeejazzyjeff said...
I wouldn't say i'm turning my nose up at him, integrity means something to me and I don't apologize for that. I'm sure Pearl would win here but he's not the only guy that can. I prefer someone that will win while playing by the rules ala Spurrier, Tanner. Just because our team isn't winning doesn't mean I have to agree with the concept of bringing in a coach who was banned for a couple years due to violations. I didn't say a word about bringing in another mid-major coach.
rmctacdmc
- 4 stars Rating: 71
7021 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5826)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
87uscfan ●
- 4 stars Rating: 74
432 votes total - Rooster
- (640)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
EarthyTechnoPop
- 5 stars Rating: 95
1074 votes total - Gamecock
- (1058)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
jaydeejazzyjeff
- 5 stars Rating: 95
579 votes total - Rooster
- (744)
- 21 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
ospop4690
- 5 stars Rating: 93
2154 votes total - Gamecock
- (1908)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
LONGBALL
- 4 stars Rating: 69
397 votes total - Rooster
- (947)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5908 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8705)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
kumarcock
- 4 stars Rating: 80
1436 votes total - Gamecock
- (1223)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
o'spop said...
It isn't about liking him. It is about having a recent issue with the NCAA that we are still working through and how hiring a known repeat cheater and liar would impact us.
First, the perception from the NCAA would be that we aren't serious about compliance. That perception could create more scrutiny from the NCAA.
Second, he has already shown to be a cheater and also a liar. He's already demonstrated he has the propensity. What's to say he won't do it again.
Those are all good reasons not to hire him. Cheating in basketball would impact all sports.
I believe he is also under a five year show cause reprimand. Means he really can't coach in the next five years unless a case is made to hire him. Does anyone really believe USC is in a position at this point in time to make that argument to the NCAA? That would be an interesting conversation to watch!
We can't touch Bruce Pearl with a ten foot pole. We just cannot and the reasons should be obvious.
GamcockDevil4
- 4 stars Rating: 80
423 votes total - Rooster
- (741)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5908 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8705)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
matt1330
- 5 stars Rating: 85
307 votes total - Bantam
- (242)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
joetheogre said...
Fair enough. But Pearl has also shown that he can take so-so talent and win, as well as recruit. He went to the tourney every year at Tennessee, a program that hisotically is a lot like USC. Pearl doesn't sell religion to his recruits or his fanbase either.
Pearl wouldn't be my first choice, but he also isn't the worst choice. A lot of people over here try and paint him as some ultra-sleezebag, a-hole when that really isn't the case. Pearl's big flaw is that he has bad judgement and a nasty habit of lying to the NCAA.
MistaQ
- 5 stars Rating: 90
455 votes total - Bantam
- (488)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MistaQ said...
Do you realize that he coached for over 10 years at the D-2 level winning like 85% of his games and a national championship, yet couldn't get a D-1 sniff until Wisconsin-Milwaukee gave him a chance? He was basically black balled because he tried to turn in Illinois for basically out cheating him as an assistant at Iowa. Some smaller school will eventually give him a chance like Morgan State did with Todd Bozeman. South Carolina should not be the school to sell their souls and bring Pearl here.
joetheogre
- 5 stars Rating: 85
5908 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (8705)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
o'spop said...
It isn't about liking him. It is about having a recent issue with the NCAA that we are still working through and how hiring a known repeat cheater and liar would impact us.
First, the perception from the NCAA would be that we aren't serious about compliance. That perception could create more scrutiny from the NCAA.
Second, he has already shown to be a cheater and also a liar. He's already demonstrated he has the propensity. What's to say he won't do it again.
Those are all good reasons not to hire him. Cheating in basketball would impact all sports.
I believe he is also under a five year show cause reprimand. Means he really can't coach in the next five years unless a case is made to hire him. Does anyone really believe USC is in a position at this point in time to make that argument to the NCAA? That would be an interesting conversation to watch!
We can't touch Bruce Pearl with a ten foot pole. We just cannot and the reasons should be obvious.
StevieGsSponsor
- 5 stars Rating: 88
113 votes total - Bantam
- (136)
- 22 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars












Hire Bruce Pearl