Online Now 1952

Palmetto Proving Grounds

The place for Gamecock talk, news and information

On this Board 1500
Record: 4035 (11/24/2012)

Online now 2002
Record: 9625 (10/8/2011)

Boards ▾

Palmetto Proving Grounds

The place for Gamecock talk, news and information

The Barnyard

The place for Gamecock football and recruiting talk, plus off-topic subjects.

The McGuire Room

The place for Gamecock basketball talk, news and information

The Sarge

The ultimate online destination for the latest scoop on Carolina's national power baseball program.

GCI Archives

Everything from Gamecock Insider Tony Morrell, in case you missed it.

Spurnotes Archives

The place to read all past editions of Spurnotes

Video Archive

Hall of Fame

The best of the best

Ticket Exchange

Buy and sell your Gamecock tickets here.

Test Forum

Feedback for TBS and 247Sports.

Reply

I really hope we land this Camara guy

  • joetheogre said...

    Serious question Big Al. Have you ever played football before?

    Not since junior high.

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl

  • MrBigAl said...

    Not since junior high.

    Leather Helmets?? :)

    GCIT

  • MrBigAl said...

    If that was his reason then IMO he made a mistake. A mistake which cost is the SEC East title.

    In what alternate reality did shaw beat auburn?

    els0528

  • MrBigAl said...

    I think Spurrier is by far the better coach. That's why I find it difficult to believe that he would allow Garcia's popularity with a segment of the team to force him to play Garcia in spite of Garcia's lousy performance.

    As for the football team's success, I'm enjoying the heck out of it.

    Thats why I made my point about ever playing football before. By your non response I will take that as a no, unless you wish to clarify. Football teams are funny organisms. Benching a player can affect the performance of others. The team was not behind Shaw after the ECU game. To keep playing Shaw had the potential for disaster.

    For someone who is enjoying the heck out of it, you do a poor job of showing it. All I ever see you say is criticisms of Hyman, Junior, players, Spurrier, etc.

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • MrBigAl said...

    Not since junior high.

    Did not see this when I made my last post. I maintain my point that teams are fragile organisms and to disrupt a team that is 4-0 is dangerous. Plus its not like Garcia had not shown he could play before 2010 and 2009 to a lesser extent were good seasons.

    You know if you showed your personal side and used some humor from time to time, people would be more receptive to your posts?

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • CockOracle said...

    Mr. Roberts, Since you decided to call me out for posting the commitments of Alabama as compared to USC, I feel the need to correct your assumption. I do not believe that we can, at this time, out recruit Alabama. Bama has too much history and they have a coach that sells himself very well on National TV while he is winning his SEC Championships and those NC Titles. My point in using his current recruiting class was to point out exactly what I said, “Coming off our greatest season in history, I thought we could upgrade our recruiting.”

    No matter what you may think and say, the fact is that to become a program that wins 9 or more games every season we have to improve our recruiting efforts overall. (have you ever actually listened to Jr speak about this?) To be able to compete against the top 4 SEC programs every season, we have to upgrade our recruiting to at least match them or come closer overall, top to bottom. We only have to play Alabama, Auburn and LSU 6 out of 10 regular seasons, so I guess your way of thinking is that we can’t out recruit LSU or Auburn, either. We have to play UGa, Fla, Arkansas and for a time Mizzo every season. So we can, have and should out recruit these guys when you consider each team’s top 10-15 recruits. The key is to bring up our 16 thru 25 recruits to include less "project" than they take on. So let’s leave Alabama out and just look at the current teams we must out recruit and where they are today;

    Auburn – 8 commits – 4 – ****, 3 - ***, 1 - ** (this recruit is a kicker and is rated the #1 Punter in the country) Florida – 15 commits – 9 - ****, 6 - *** (all 6 *** are rated 5.7 – to receive **** recruit needs 5.8 rating) UGa. – 15 commits – 7 - ****, 8 - *** (5 of their *** are rated 5.7 – to receive **** recruit needs 5.8 rating) LSU – 9 commits – 4 - ****, 5 - *** Tenn. – 4 commits – 2 ****, 2 - *** Vandy – 7 commits – 2 ****, 5 *** Mizzo – 8 commits – 2 ****, 6 ***

    As of today, two teams that we have beaten on the field 2 years in a row, are currently out recruiting us and did so last year as well. Historically, these two programs have been much better than us in prior years. We caught them and passed them but it seems they took notice and are determined to overcome us, first by out recruiting us then on the field. Sorry, I don’t want to go back to trying to stay ahead of Vandy and Uk while losing 3 of 4 to either of those programs.

    So let’s all be clear about a few assumptions:

    I question USC offering “projects” early in the recruiting process because I feel (that would be my opinion) that is not upgrading our recruiting. (by the way an offer is just that, if the kid offered jumps on it, he's a commit) Sooner or later we either land more 4 & 5 star recruits than 3 & 2 star, or we will be bi-passed by the programs we should compete against every year if we are to remain one of the Top 5 SEC teams. You are entitled to your opinion that we seem to have the greatest coaching staff in America so we can continue to sign 4 to 5 “projects” every year and it never hurt us. They all are just going to become great players because we’ve had a few that did. Sorry, everything in this world revolves around math and the averages are stacked against you. Even Clemson will benefit from all their 4 and 5 star recruits sooner rather than later.

    I understand recruiting, unlike some on this site I’ve been around for a long time. I understand sometimes you offer one recruit to land another better recruit later at the same school. We just signed two brothers, knowing one should be successful and hoping the other (project) would work hard and become a better player. I hope it happens but I have seen the good and the very bad in USC’s recruiting. The bad includes our current head coach, who lost over 30% of his first 3 recruiting classes. He allowed his OLine coach to recruit guys that over half shouldn’t have been offered D-1 scholarships and the program suffered for 5 yrs because of it. He isn’t perfect. In fact, as hard as this is to believe the program turned on recruiting when Ellis Johnson got heavily involved in the process. Even Spurrier admitted as much.

    We have a new staff of defensive recruiters that have not proven themselves so I am sorry but they don’t get to ride the credit of other coach’s work. They have to earn their place. This might be a shock to some as well, Spurrier can be lazy! He has stated for years that he doesn’t like recruiting and he allows his coaches to make their own choices in recruits without much if any input from him. He goes where they tell him he is needed and he does a good sells job with the families. Just as he said with the hiring of the new asst coaches, “well that’s who Coach Ward felt was best”.

    It worked under Johnson but the jury is still out on Ward and his new asst coaches. Like someone said one good year, in Wards case, doesn't make you a legend in recruiting. I want to see him succeed, but I have a right to express my opinion and my concern until they do. I am sorry but I have had enough of the losing to programs that shouldn’t think they can compete with us. I don’t want to see another coach get lazy to the point that they allow our recruiting efforts to bring in players that might be decent D-1 players one day while not landing recruits that stand a better chance of playing from day one. To actually win the SEC and remain in the hunt year after year, we have to begin recruiting more and more players that are not projects, agin in my opinion and based on successful programs. I don't want USC to be the next Kansas.

    It seems that on this site more and more, any poster that posts a question or asks a question as to why our coaches are doing something, is too often thrown under the bus as being negative or thinking he knows more than the coach. I am a human being with an education. Therefore, I do not follow blindly just because. I love USC. I support the sports programs with my money, my attendance and legal services. While I started out in school somewhere else, I transferred to USC and ended my playing career with a torn up knee. I love USC. I am proud of what Coaches Spurrier, Tanner and others are doing at USC now. I know several coaches on both the football and baseball staffs. I respect them highly. But I still have a right to question them and will as long as they accept a pay check from the school I financially support.

    Just because I question them, does not mean that I am being negative. Just because I do not agree with every statement or article that is written by the staff of this site, also doesn’t mean that I know more than they or think my opinion is the gospel and everyone that disagrees with me is just stupid. It is just my opinion and questions that I am concerned with. Steve Spurrier is paid to continue to build this program to a true championship team and I believe he will. But I thought Lou Holtz was on the right track to that as well. I thought Eddie Fogler was too. But both of them got lazy in recruiting after limited success and they had to be replaced. But while they were going through the motions of recruiting, they were also losing on the field or court. When they had to be replaced it was fans like me that had to endure the insults and jokes from other team fans as well as our getting beat by those teams. So excuse me if I question something I don’t like or understand that our coaches do, I have earned the right by remaining a loyal fan of this school for 47 yrs.

    Finally, you and anyone else have a few options. You can read my words and understand that I am not trying to be negative and usually I support my opinions with facts but I will not always toe the party line in blindly supporting any coach. You can dis-agree and point out to me why you think I am wrong, or you could answer my question with something other than, cause the coach said so or an insult. You can also, press that ignore button on this site and not read my opinions any longer. You could then focus more on the self proclaimed true believers that see no wrong in anything as long as it is done by a USC coach even to the point of arguing that Darrin Horn deserved another year. Classic! Or that some player is the world’s best because he happens to play for USC and he is just Awesome because he is, well just Awesome.

    You have a choice.

    Holy Yawn!!!

    This same old we have to have four and five star recruits is getting old. Especially in the same post that talks about O-line recruiting yet forgets that our best Oline recruiting class in history rankings wise may have been our worst Oline recruiting class ever.

    It is weird that you trust a recruiting website(s?) over your own coaches evaluations despite a ton of evidence that both can be fallible.

    We signed 11 four stars last year. Will they all be awesome?

    In 2010, we signed a five star (Clowney) and 8 four stars. Four star players from that class yet to contribute (some of whom I still have high hopes for mind you): S. Jeffrey, S. Royster, K. Broome, P. Dukes, D. Byrd (arguably). Three star players who have contributed: Matulis, B. Williams, Buster Anderson, B. Wilds. Other three stars in that class that coaches have spoken highly of: Shon Carson, T. McEvoy, C. Cooper, D. Green, A. Christian, KJ Brent, K. Marcus, the Dixons.

    Recruiting is inexact...and as educated as you are, you should know it's not math. Clemson has made a living off winning the recruiting national championship...b/c they pay a lot more attention to recruiting websites than our staff does. See Kenneth Page as Exhibit 1.

    You don't earn the right to question the school any more than we earn the right to question your opinion. It's football and recruiting. Everyone's going to question everyone and everyone's going to be right...and wrong. There is no spoon.

    All that said, your opinions are yours and you're welcome to them.

    signature image
    signature image

    Roses are red, violets are blue, I'm a schizophrenic and so am I.

    jshusc

  • GCIT said...

    Leather Helmets?? :)

    Helmets?

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl

  • joetheogre said...

    Did not see this when I made my last post. I maintain my point that teams are fragile organisms and to disrupt a team that is 4-0 is dangerous. Plus its not like Garcia had not shown he could play before 2010 and 2009 to a lesser extent were good seasons.

    You know if you showed your personal side and used some humor from time to time, people would be more receptive to your posts?

    A football team is much like any group in that it's leader is charged with making decisions based on what's best for the group as a whole, irrespective of whether those decisions are popular. I refuse to believe that a man as strong-willed as Steve Spurrier would play someone simply because he wanted to avoid widespread pouting among a segment of the team.

    Spurrier...I appreciate him plenty

    MrBigAl

  • I am pretty sure fans were not the reason Garcia played and the players were not the main reason...if one at all.

    els0528

  • BigAl, I think you are spot on with your assessments. They may not be popular, but some here need to realize our coaches are human and that constructive criticism is not a bad thing and neither is discussion. Keep up the good work and.......

    Illegitimi non carborundum

    signature image

    Brooster

  • Bump for the commitment. gamecocks

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre

  • joetheogre said...

    Yes.

    Serious question Big Al. Have you ever seen a grown man naked before?

    moon

    BritBrant

  • sigmon fraud said...

    moon

    rockon

    signature image signature image signature image

    "Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, parties, nations, and ages it is the rule." - Friedrich Nietzsche

    joetheogre