-
chucktcock ●
- 4 stars Rating: 75
1439 votes total - Gamecock
- (1219)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
JamRockCock
- 5 stars Rating: 86
1380 votes total - Gamecock
- (1180)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of TheBigSpur or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
Jefe5235 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
4921 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5733)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- This post is for members of TheBigSpur or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial
MCR
- 5 stars Rating: 88
4921 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5123)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Jefe5235 said...
Trees are definitely plantable, but it takes decades for fast growing trees to reach maturity. Transplanting large trees can cost $100,000+ depending on size and type. I'm not a golf course expert, but I live within a few miles of 7-8 courses. Each of them was built on "wooded" land. I can't imagine a course where one looks accross 300 yards of land without any mature trees.
GamecockFet
- 5 stars Rating: 95
174 votes total - Bantam
- (57)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Walterboro Cock
- 5 stars Rating: 82
788 votes total - Rooster
- (863)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GVegasCock
- 5 stars Rating: 91
136 votes total - Bantam
- (165)
- 9 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Walterboro Cock
- 5 stars Rating: 82
788 votes total - Rooster
- (863)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GamecockFet said...
You ever seen a links course? Most of them have no mature trees, and some have no trees at all. Granted there are very few true links courses in the US, but why not think outside the box and be unique.
I'm not a golfing guru like my boy koondog, but I think it would be awesome to build a true links style course behind the Farmer's Market...particularly if the property directly adjacent to the river could be purchased, allowing for river views and more scenic sight lines.
I also think the uniqueness of a links style course minutes from the city would draw a huge amount of golfers...I know I'd get in line!Jefe5235 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
4921 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5733)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GVegasCock said...
Only problem with a links course, especially in Columbia, is no SHADE! It would be very hot for how many months out of the year - 5 or 6? And most golfers want to enjoy the whole "walk in the park" feeling they get at most golf courses. There is a reason there aren't many links courses in the U.S. In Columbia it would feel like a desert.
GamecockFet
- 5 stars Rating: 95
174 votes total - Bantam
- (57)
- 20 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
johnsislandcock said...
As a golf course superintendent for 13 years and having been involved in the construction of three different courses, I can tell you the cost to build a new course with practice facility and clubhouse would exceed the $15 million mark. Cost would depend greatly on location, soil type, acreage, and expectations. Maintenance cost of the course typically run $5 - $8,000 per acre so looking at your average 120 acres of maintained turf that would be a maintence cost of $600,000 to $960,000, again, dependent upon expectations. Overall operating budget would be in the neighborhood of 2 to 2.5 million per year. And as far as Clemson goes, remember they have a huge Turfgrass program with alot of "free" labor. Their costs are very limited. I am sure they also get help from the govt with agricultural grants.
crowclub
- 4 stars Rating: 74
841 votes total - Gamecock
- (1147)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
GamecockFet said...
Yeah I agree GVegas...that would be a big issue for some. I'm born and raised in Columbia so I'm well aware of the heat, I guess I'm just of the mindset that when it's "Columbia hot" it doesn't matter if you're under a big oak tree or standing in an open field...it's hot. That said, its just my personal pipe dream...I just think it would be so unique that people would be all over it. Also, it would definitely give our golf teams a "home course advantage" if they hosted tournaments.
My question to you and others familiar with local course management tying back into the lack of shade and heat... How much more would it cost to operate a links course versus a standard pine-tree lined course in regards to water etc in the summer. Thanks
GVegasCock
- 5 stars Rating: 91
136 votes total - Bantam
- (165)
- 9 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CAPTIVA73 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
358 votes total - Bantam
- (445)
- 23 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GVegasCock said...
Well the course would still have to be watered of course. Trees are as hungry for water as turf is; the real question is what is the water source. Some courses I have worked at have their own water source (normally a combination of lake / pond / creek / well, etc). So the only $$ spent is on power for the pumps to push it out on the course. If you must pump city water you could easily spend 6 figures plus just on water. Their are alternatives though: effluent, non-potable water etc.
One great thing about "links" courses overseas is many of them are not even irrigated, or maybe just the greens. In Scotland / Ireland, etc the turf receives most of its water from Mother Nature.
Jefe5235 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
4921 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5733)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GVegasCock
- 5 stars Rating: 91
136 votes total - Bantam
- (165)
- 9 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MCR said...
There are a number of nice courses nearby. It would be much better for the university to go through some major donors who are members at a local club and establish a partnership. USC could fund some improvements in return for a private club being the official home course of the men's and women's programs.
LilJerySeinfeld ●
- 3 stars Rating: 53
8977 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (4474)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
LilJerySeinfeld ●
- 3 stars Rating: 53
8977 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (4474)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 3 stars
-
johnsislandcock ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
316 votes total - Bantam
- (472)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GVegasCock said...
No offense Jefe, but a blanket statement like "turf needs more water than trees" is simply not accurate in all cases. Fescue vs pine tree: correct; Bermuda grass vs oak tree: incorrect. What is true now is that most Bermuda grasses do not need a lot of water to be a good playing surface. But golfers like to see the dark green color. Nobody likes a brown tree.
johnsislandcock ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
316 votes total - Bantam
- (472)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
johnsislandcock said...
Actually, most naturally growing trees only need the water that rainfall provides......maintaining turf on a golf course in the condition that would be expected for the University of South Carolina Gamecocks golf team would require a great deal more water. An average 100 acres of maintained turf requires 500,000 to 700,000 gallons of water per irrigation cycle to apply a .25" to the course ever 2 or 3 days. Again, dependent on the soil. A sandier soil will require more than a clay soil. Effluent water is definitely a possibility if Columbia has that sort of facility. There would be increased maintanence cost to deal with the impurities that comes with that water source but its not prohibitive.
redfisherman
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1329 votes total - Gamecock
- (1256)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
GVegasCock said...
No offense Jefe, but a blanket statement like "turf needs more water than trees" is simply not accurate in all cases. Fescue vs pine tree: correct; Bermuda grass vs oak tree: incorrect. What is true now is that most Bermuda grasses do not need a lot of water to be a good playing surface. But golfers like to see the dark green color. Nobody likes a brown tree.
This post was edited by Jefe5235 on 3/15/2013 at 8:32 AM
Jefe5235 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
4921 votes total - Bronze Spur
- (5733)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
johnsislandcock ●
- 5 stars Rating: 87
316 votes total - Bantam
- (472)
- 33 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Jefe5235 said...
Not sure i understand. Once established an oak tree will live without irrigation. Bermuda has to have irrigation if its for a sports field or golf course. Otherwise it goes dormant during dry spells, fails to recover from traffic, and generally looks like crap. I know there are types of Bermuda that use less water and are drought tolerant, but its still turf grass with roots that go down 2-3 inches.
Put it this way...if you know of a type of Bermuda that will give me green grass without the big summer water bill let me know where I can buy it. My oaks, pines, walnut, and dogwoods aren't irrigated. I'd LOVE to have a great looking lawn without the $180 water bill. Oh, BTW, not trying to be argumentative, I'm seriously interested.
GVegasCock
- 5 stars Rating: 91
136 votes total - Bantam
- (165)
- 9 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4


Next phase of AD spending should include a SCar Golf Course