Online Now 2591

Palmetto Proving Grounds

The place for Gamecock talk, news and information

On this Board 1512
Record: 4035 (11/24/2012)

Online now 2396
Record: 9625 (10/8/2011)

Boards ▾

Palmetto Proving Grounds

The place for Gamecock talk, news and information

The Barnyard

The place for Gamecock football and recruiting talk, plus off-topic subjects.

The McGuire Room

The place for Gamecock basketball talk, news and information

The Sarge

The ultimate online destination for the latest scoop on Carolina's national power baseball program.

GCI Archives

Everything from Gamecock Insider Tony Morrell, in case you missed it.

Spurnotes Archives

The place to read all past editions of Spurnotes

Video Archive

Hall of Fame

The best of the best

Ticket Exchange

Buy and sell your Gamecock tickets here.

Test Forum

Feedback for TBS and 247Sports.

Reply

Next phase of AD spending should include a SCar Golf Course

  • Why don't we buy Sedgeweed? Bet the soil there is second to none.

    chucktcock

  • SIAP- what is on and who owns all of the land behind the old farmers market to the river? Seems like that would be the obvious place to put one.

    JamRockCock

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    Jefe5235

  • This post is for members of TheBigSpur or All Access VIP members only. Start Free Trial

    MCR

  • Jefe5235 said...

    Trees are definitely plantable, but it takes decades for fast growing trees to reach maturity. Transplanting large trees can cost $100,000+ depending on size and type. I'm not a golf course expert, but I live within a few miles of 7-8 courses. Each of them was built on "wooded" land. I can't imagine a course where one looks accross 300 yards of land without any mature trees.

    You ever seen a links course? Most of them have no mature trees, and some have no trees at all. Granted there are very few true links courses in the US, but why not think outside the box and be unique.
    I'm not a golfing guru like my boy koondog, but I think it would be awesome to build a true links style course behind the Farmer's Market...particularly if the property directly adjacent to the river could be purchased, allowing for river views and more scenic sight lines.
    I also think the uniqueness of a links style course minutes from the city would draw a huge amount of golfers...I know I'd get in line!

    GamecockFet

  • School needs to build it. Gamecock Club membership should have option/tie-in for golf club membership. No brainer. We'd probably never miss a baseball or basketball game if we could come up to golf and then head to the CLA or Carolina Stadium afterwards.

    Walterboro Cock

  • Only problem with a links course, especially in Columbia, is no SHADE! It would be very hot for how many months out of the year - 5 or 6? And most golfers want to enjoy the whole "walk in the park" feeling they get at most golf courses. There is a reason there aren't many links courses in the U.S. In Columbia it would feel like a desert.

    The private club concept is very problematic. That would require a core group of investors (members) who can pony up the $$ to get started and can absorb the losses on operating costs the first (several) years. There just aren't that many people around who love golf (or golf in Columbia) enough to get a club like that going. JICock mentioned the operating costs. Even on a modest budget (let's just say 1.5 million), you would need 300 members paying roughly $420 a month. Stuff like cart fees, range fees, food and beverage brings in additional revenue but keep in mind - 1.5 is a pretty small number for a golf operation. Finding 300 people to keep the club running is a massive challenge. There is a reason why the U.S. only saw about 12 or so new courses opened last year. Back in the mid-90's we saw 300+ every year.

    GVegasCock

  • links course...no

    This post was edited by Walterboro Cock on 3/14/2013 at 10:10 AM

    Walterboro Cock

  • GamecockFet said...

    You ever seen a links course? Most of them have no mature trees, and some have no trees at all. Granted there are very few true links courses in the US, but why not think outside the box and be unique.
    I'm not a golfing guru like my boy koondog, but I think it would be awesome to build a true links style course behind the Farmer's Market...particularly if the property directly adjacent to the river could be purchased, allowing for river views and more scenic sight lines.
    I also think the uniqueness of a links style course minutes from the city would draw a huge amount of golfers...I know I'd get in line!

    That would be cool as long as you could maintain a good view of the river. Most links courses make up for the lack of trees by being next to the ocean or another large body of water.

    Jefe5235

  • Koondog I believe I read somewhere that the school was puttting in a practice facility for the golf team over in Casey right by the ParTee driving range. Do you know if there is any validity to this?

    lssonnenberg

  • GVegasCock said...

    Only problem with a links course, especially in Columbia, is no SHADE! It would be very hot for how many months out of the year - 5 or 6? And most golfers want to enjoy the whole "walk in the park" feeling they get at most golf courses. There is a reason there aren't many links courses in the U.S. In Columbia it would feel like a desert.

    Yeah I agree GVegas...that would be a big issue for some. I'm born and raised in Columbia so I'm well aware of the heat, I guess I'm just of the mindset that when it's "Columbia hot" it doesn't matter if you're under a big oak tree or standing in an open field...it's hot.
    That said, its just my personal pipe dream...I just think it would be so unique that people would be all over it. Also, it would definitely give our golf teams a "home course advantage" if they hosted tournaments.

    My question to you and others familiar with local course management tying back into the lack of shade and heat...
    How much more would it cost to operate a links course versus a standard pine-tree lined course in regards to water etc in the summer. Thanks

    GamecockFet

  • lssonnenberg said...

    Koondog I believe I read somewhere that the school was puttting in a practice facility for the golf team over in Casey right by the ParTee driving range. Do you know if there is any validity to this?

    Issonnenberg..yeah they put one in out there. I haven't spent much time on it. It was completed the year after i left. I think they put about $100K in it. I do like the Par tee driving range. . decent balls, decent grass...which is all you need...but it's still an old junk yard. haha

    koondog

  • johnsislandcock said...

    As a golf course superintendent for 13 years and having been involved in the construction of three different courses, I can tell you the cost to build a new course with practice facility and clubhouse would exceed the $15 million mark. Cost would depend greatly on location, soil type, acreage, and expectations. Maintenance cost of the course typically run $5 - $8,000 per acre so looking at your average 120 acres of maintained turf that would be a maintence cost of $600,000 to $960,000, again, dependent upon expectations. Overall operating budget would be in the neighborhood of 2 to 2.5 million per year. And as far as Clemson goes, remember they have a huge Turfgrass program with alot of "free" labor. Their costs are very limited. I am sure they also get help from the govt with agricultural grants.

    Not to mention they have their own type of grass. A cross between Bent/ and Synthetic Sensamilla. Guaranteed to let you play 18 holes on it and get stoned to the begisis belt awterward. smoke

    crowclub

  • GamecockFet said...

    Yeah I agree GVegas...that would be a big issue for some. I'm born and raised in Columbia so I'm well aware of the heat, I guess I'm just of the mindset that when it's "Columbia hot" it doesn't matter if you're under a big oak tree or standing in an open field...it's hot. That said, its just my personal pipe dream...I just think it would be so unique that people would be all over it. Also, it would definitely give our golf teams a "home course advantage" if they hosted tournaments.

    My question to you and others familiar with local course management tying back into the lack of shade and heat... How much more would it cost to operate a links course versus a standard pine-tree lined course in regards to water etc in the summer. Thanks

    Well the course would still have to be watered of course. Trees are as hungry for water as turf is; the real question is what is the water source. Some courses I have worked at have their own water source (normally a combination of lake / pond / creek / well, etc). So the only $$ spent is on power for the pumps to push it out on the course. If you must pump city water you could easily spend 6 figures plus just on water. Their are alternatives though: effluent, non-potable water etc.

    One great thing about "links" courses overseas is many of them are not even irrigated, or maybe just the greens. In Scotland / Ireland, etc the turf receives most of its water from Mother Nature.

    GVegasCock

  • With golf being as big a business in South Carolina as it is - hpw many courses at Myrtle Beach and Hilton Head - hopefully could turn it into both athletic and academic value.
    I think the UNiversity Club had the right idea - linking it to Carolina - not sure what happened. Hass Columbia built an exclusive private golf club in years - perhaps linking one to Carolina,
    with also a private membership might provide sufficient economic support.

    CAPTIVA73

  • GVegasCock said...

    Well the course would still have to be watered of course. Trees are as hungry for water as turf is; the real question is what is the water source. Some courses I have worked at have their own water source (normally a combination of lake / pond / creek / well, etc). So the only $$ spent is on power for the pumps to push it out on the course. If you must pump city water you could easily spend 6 figures plus just on water. Their are alternatives though: effluent, non-potable water etc.

    One great thing about "links" courses overseas is many of them are not even irrigated, or maybe just the greens. In Scotland / Ireland, etc the turf receives most of its water from Mother Nature.

    FWIW, turf needs exponentially more water than trees. Seems like wells and/or the river could resolve irrigation issues though.

    Jefe5235

  • No offense Jefe, but a blanket statement like "turf needs more water than trees" is simply not accurate in all cases. Fescue vs pine tree: correct; Bermuda grass vs oak tree: incorrect. What is true now is that most Bermuda grasses do not need a lot of water to be a good playing surface. But golfers like to see the dark green color. Nobody likes a brown tree.

    GVegasCock

  • MCR said...

    There are a number of nice courses nearby. It would be much better for the university to go through some major donors who are members at a local club and establish a partnership. USC could fund some improvements in return for a private club being the official home course of the men's and women's programs.

    People are members of a private club for a reason. No self respecting private club is going to become the home club to a college golf team

    LilJerySeinfeld

  • lssonnenberg said...

    Koondog I believe I read somewhere that the school was puttting in a practice facility for the golf team over in Casey right by the ParTee driving range. Do you know if there is any validity to this?

    Yes, we've spent the money and it's done. It looks nice. No one except golf teams are allowed over there. It looks like augusta national next to sedgeweed.

    LilJerySeinfeld

  • crowclub said...

    Not to mention they have their own type of grass. A cross between Bent/ and Synthetic Sensamilla. Guaranteed to let you play 18 holes on it and get stoned to the begisis belt awterward.

    LOL......Plastic explosives in the shape of rabbits and squirrels would definitely raise the annual budget........DAMN GOPHERS!!!

    johnsislandcock

  • GVegasCock said...

    No offense Jefe, but a blanket statement like "turf needs more water than trees" is simply not accurate in all cases. Fescue vs pine tree: correct; Bermuda grass vs oak tree: incorrect. What is true now is that most Bermuda grasses do not need a lot of water to be a good playing surface. But golfers like to see the dark green color. Nobody likes a brown tree.

    Actually, most naturally growing trees only need the water that rainfall provides......maintaining turf on a golf course in the condition that would be expected for the University of South Carolina Gamecocks golf team would require a great deal more water. An average 100 acres of maintained turf requires 500,000 to 700,000 gallons of water per irrigation cycle to apply a .25" to the course ever 2 or 3 days. Again, dependent on the soil. A sandier soil will require more than a clay soil. Effluent water is definitely a possibility if Columbia has that sort of facility. There would be increased maintanence cost to deal with the impurities that comes with that water source but its not prohibitive.

    johnsislandcock

  • johnsislandcock said...

    Actually, most naturally growing trees only need the water that rainfall provides......maintaining turf on a golf course in the condition that would be expected for the University of South Carolina Gamecocks golf team would require a great deal more water. An average 100 acres of maintained turf requires 500,000 to 700,000 gallons of water per irrigation cycle to apply a .25" to the course ever 2 or 3 days. Again, dependent on the soil. A sandier soil will require more than a clay soil. Effluent water is definitely a possibility if Columbia has that sort of facility. There would be increased maintanence cost to deal with the impurities that comes with that water source but its not prohibitive.

    I don't know anything on this subject, but I do know all the farm land in this area have pivot irrigation systems supplied by numerous wells.

    redfisherman

  • GVegasCock said...

    No offense Jefe, but a blanket statement like "turf needs more water than trees" is simply not accurate in all cases. Fescue vs pine tree: correct; Bermuda grass vs oak tree: incorrect. What is true now is that most Bermuda grasses do not need a lot of water to be a good playing surface. But golfers like to see the dark green color. Nobody likes a brown tree.

    Not sure i understand. Once established an oak tree will live without irrigation. Bermuda has to have irrigation if its for a sports field or golf course. Otherwise it goes dormant during dry spells, fails to recover from traffic, and generally looks like crap. I know there are types of Bermuda that use less water and are drought tolerant, but its still turf grass with roots that go down 2-3 inches.

    Put it this way...if you know of a type of Bermuda that will give me green grass without the big summer water bill let me know where I can buy it. My oaks, pines, walnut, and dogwoods aren't irrigated. I'd LOVE to have a great looking lawn without the $180 water bill. Oh, BTW, not trying to be argumentative, I'm seriously interested.

    This post was edited by Jefe5235 on 3/15/2013 at 8:32 AM

    Jefe5235

  • redfisherman said...

    I don't know anything on this subject, but I do know all the farm land in this area have pivot irrigation systems supplied by numerous wells.

    Wells are definitely possibiities... I have one on my current golf course. However, DHEC only allows a maximum withdrawal of 3 million gallons per month for golf course use(farms get exemptions from this because well they are farms) While that may sound like alot, its not. During a dry spring in May or June you can easily run up to 15 million gallons to keep a golf course maintained properly. Thats about 12 million you would hope to get from rainfall and on course ponds. Which is why effluent would be a good alternative if its available.

    johnsislandcock

  • Jefe5235 said...

    Not sure i understand. Once established an oak tree will live without irrigation. Bermuda has to have irrigation if its for a sports field or golf course. Otherwise it goes dormant during dry spells, fails to recover from traffic, and generally looks like crap. I know there are types of Bermuda that use less water and are drought tolerant, but its still turf grass with roots that go down 2-3 inches.

    Put it this way...if you know of a type of Bermuda that will give me green grass without the big summer water bill let me know where I can buy it. My oaks, pines, walnut, and dogwoods aren't irrigated. I'd LOVE to have a great looking lawn without the $180 water bill. Oh, BTW, not trying to be argumentative, I'm seriously interested.

    Jefe you must have a big yard! Sadly, there is no magical Bermuda grass that will stay green during a Columbia summer without irrigation. Unless it rains every other day. I actually prefer zoysia grass as it grows a little slower and can handle a little shade. Like you, I'm not trying to argue over trees / turf. I should have qualified my statement by saying that if you want "healthy" and "healthy looking" trees, they do require some water. I should have said "big trees are big water users". If its available that is.

    GVegasCock