-
corndog
- 2 stars Rating: 40
1403 votes total - Rooster
- (950)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
Black Death7
- 5 stars Rating: 85
3111 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (3864)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
pcgamecock2001
- 4 stars Rating: 75
1164 votes total - Gamecock
- (1472)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
DF2 said...
Dude, you just proved my point.
Where is the forecast in there? There isnt one. He says to "be cautions", so he is right no matter what happens. Then he brags about how he doesnt get excited and he doesnt steal info from the NWS, which is especially ironic considering the single largest, most prominent piece of information on his blog is a cut and pasted map from the NWS showing GSP with a great chance of snow. The he talks about how the Western Carolinas usually have calm weather this time of year, the models are in dissagreement, yada, yada, yes yes, we all know that dude, we all have access to that info.
My point is, he seems to be very snooty and look down his nose at folks like the NWS and other meteorologists who make predictions (or, who are being sensational as he seems to think), but that is what they get paid for. Interpreting data and offering their professional opinions. He is just sitting back and saying "I told you so" this morning because the models are now showing a ho hum snow event. Well, congrats dude. You didnt make a forecast, and so you weren't "wrong". Anyone can just look at a chart or a model and say "things are unpredictable" "dont get too excited", which is fine, but done spend half your blog ripping on the professionals who are bold enough to take a stab at a prediction.
gococks31
- 4 stars Rating: 79
1355 votes total - Gamecock
- (1178)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
corndog
- 2 stars Rating: 40
1403 votes total - Rooster
- (950)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
radcock
- 5 stars Rating: 86
764 votes total - Rooster
- (697)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
radcock said...
As stated earlier, I only know what you guys post and link.
Based on history, do we usually miss on snow because the moisture from the gulf us too warm and pushes back against the frosty low from canada or is it the opposite?
Since I don't follow this often, it could be that we miss due to the rain staying south, but it sure seems like it is usually from it not being cold enough. If this is the case, I vote that the models will fail for the next 24 hours and then as the moisture builds over the gulf and that front gains strength, it will fight its way inland and we will get pounded.
History does prove that it takes perfect conditions to get much snow in SC. I only remember one white Christmas in my 42 years.
-
radcock said...
As stated earlier, I only know what you guys post and link.
Based on history, do we usually miss on snow because the moisture from the gulf us too warm and pushes back against the frosty low from canada or is it the opposite?
Since I don't follow this often, it could be that we miss due to the rain staying south, but it sure seems like it is usually from it not being cold enough. If this is the case, I vote that the models will fail for the next 24 hours and then as the moisture builds over the gulf and that front gains strength, it will fight its way inland and we will get pounded.
History does prove that it takes perfect conditions to get much snow in SC. I only remember one white Christmas in my 42 years.
-
DF2 said...
Rad, this thing below is our low pressure system right now, out over the desert SW. It needs to beef up early toomorrow morning over Texas, and preferably slow down. It has to be able to hold its own with that northern stream, so that the two can work together, instead of getting dominated by it and forced south.
http://i56.tinypic.com/2s16rtj.gif
radcock
- 5 stars Rating: 86
764 votes total - Rooster
- (697)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
radcock said...
Thats my question....not knowing how often this scenario presents itself, and knowing that our winter moisture typically come via the gulf as it moves northeast, don't y'all think this things picks up energy and "fights back"? As a big fan of thermodynamics, I completely get the conservation and dispersion of energy (first 2 laws) and how it relates to weather formation, but I do not know the "historic trends". It makes more sense to me that the recent warm weather may fuel the storm due to differences in temperature increasing the rate of energy transfer. Obviously, the differences in pressure work in unison but also have an independent effect on the storm as it grabs moisture at sea level from the gulf and rises as the storm moves inland. This makes me think our low pressure system heading this way will strengthen. I assume the most turbulent weather occurs at the borders of the high and low pressure systems, but I guess our problem is this may be too far south of us.
What I don't understand fully is the effect of the changing jet stream and the energy of the it carriers in regards to la nina. I may have to research it when I have time as I find this stuff entertaining. Either way, I always enjoy the winter weather threads.
This post was edited by DF2 on 12/23/2010 at 2:38 PM
-
radcock
- 5 stars Rating: 86
764 votes total - Rooster
- (697)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
radcock said...
I noticed that on one of the maps....the usual northeastern "bump" of the polar jet is not there.
Since we have no real historic data ( ie our N is not high enough for statistical significance) then we should just stare out our windows because the models don't have enough information to make a confident prediction.
I will forewarn my kids not to get excited as my wife revealed the NWS prediction from this am for snow!
This post was edited by DF2 on 12/23/2010 at 2:58 PM
-
uscshane
- 4 stars Rating: 69
259 votes total - Bantam
- (423)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
corndog
- 2 stars Rating: 40
1403 votes total - Rooster
- (950)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 2 stars
-
DF2 said...
Not necessarily. The models appear to have trouble coming to an agreement on what happens with regards to the phasing or merging of the two systems, and if they dont merge, what then happens to the southern low, but they are good for showing us what the low will do in the short term, which is important; will it pick up steam, will it stay up, go south,speed up, slow down, etc. Even if the models cant accurately predict the phasing or non phasing of the two systems, they can predict what the southern low will do, and it will help humans infer or predict how the two systems might interact.
Conversely, if they DO start to show a phasing trend over the next 12 hours, well then disco time.
DT USC
- 5 stars Rating: 90
365 votes total - Rooster
- (657)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
pcgamecock2001
- 4 stars Rating: 75
1164 votes total - Gamecock
- (1472)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
DT USC
- 5 stars Rating: 90
365 votes total - Rooster
- (657)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
CaliGamecock9095
- 5 stars Rating: 86
3897 votes total - Fighting Gamecock
- (4507)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
DT USC said...
Got ya, thanks. I thought the models just reflected what is happening and projected to happen, then people predicted the weather off of that. I guess I wasn't thinking about the models projecting what will/could happen based on historical data. I just thought it took into account all of the actual data in the atmosphere at that time.
-
DT USC said...
Got ya, thanks. I thought the models just reflected what is happening and projected to happen, then people predicted the weather off of that. I guess I wasn't thinking about the models projecting what will/could happen based on historical data. It makes sense. I thought it took into account all of the actual data in the atmosphere at that time. Other than this thread and the one like it last year, I have never really thought about what makes the weather the way it is. I just look at the news and forecasts.
pcgamecock2001
- 4 stars Rating: 75
1164 votes total - Gamecock
- (1472)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 4 stars
-
DT USC
- 5 stars Rating: 90
365 votes total - Rooster
- (657)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
- Post a New Topic
- Back to Topics
- « Previous Topic
- Next Topic »
- Boards ▾
- Pages: 1 | ... | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ... | 90










Weather Thread